disposed whitegoods, recyclable containers) and two creeks with little or no littoral vegetation. The study site was an open, grassed area featuring large mounds of garden and tree waste, other solid waste (e.g. The study was conducted at the Cairns City Council Waste Transfer Facility in Smithfield, a suburb of Cairns. In this report, we describe the mosquito-catching abilities of the two traps thought to be the most effective: the Mega-Catch™ ‘Ultra’ (Envirosafe Technologies, New Zealand) and the Mosquito Magnet ‘Pro’ (American Biophysics Corporation, USA). However, there are few scientifically sound comparisons between available traps. IntroductionĪ wide variety of mosquito traps are available to public consumers, particularly in the USA, where emerging fatal mosquito-borne illnesses stimulate the market for such devices. Both traps caught similar numbers of species, in similar proportions. The Mega-Catch™ ‘Ultra’ had a significantly greater mean catch per night. In this report, we describe and discuss the performance of these two traps. Tests were conducted in tropical Far North Queensland to compare the performance of the two mosquito traps in the public consumer market that are thought to be the most effective: the Mega-Catch™ ‘Ultra’ (Envirosafe Technologies, New Zealand) and the Mosquito Magnet ‘Pro’ (American Biophysics Corporation, USA). School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine (Cairns, Building E1), James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland 4870. Tropical Public Health Unit Network, Queensland Health, 19 Aplin St Cairns, Queensland 4870.Williams², PhD (University of South Australia) Ritch ie¹, PhD (University of Florida) & Dr Craig R. A comparison of commercially available mosquito traps in Cairns, Far North Queensland, Australia: comparing the Mega-Catch™ ‘Ultra’ and the Mosquito Magnet ‘Pro’ by Dr Scott A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |